Ten Key Points:
- All human beings use a certain set of words in order to justify their actions or beliefs definitely. These specific words not only dictate how we feel about ourselves but also how we feel about others based on their usage of similar words. These words have been deemed “final vocabulary” (i.e. “right”, “wrong”, “justice”, “fair”)
- There are those who are considered “ironists” based on their usage and understanding of said words. These are individuals who are fully aware of their usage of said words but acknowledge the fact that there are others who use words that may contradict their beliefs. This acknowledgement creates an inner struggle because even though their personal vocabulary is set, they oft change their minds while listening and understanding other’s “final vocabulary”. They are oft more concerned with people’s opinion rather than what is actually true.
- Those who do not subject themselves to the flaws of the ironist are considered “commonsensical”. Those who employ common sense understand that while others may use different “final vocabulary”, they do not judge or ridicule said person for it.
- Metaphysicians oppose the ironist stance because they do not concern themselves with their own vocabulary but concern themselves with what is actually the truth. They believe that once a person achieves the understanding of what is true, this person should dictate their final vocabulary accordingly.
- Metaphysicians also believe that people are born with a natural sense of what is the actual truth. They believe that those seeking knowledge and understanding will grasp what is actually true once they explore all options. Metaphysicians subscribe to the “Platonic Theory of Recollection”, which dictates that humans have truth “built in us” which allows us to identify truth once we have heard it.
- Metaphysicians use certain techniques to actually figure out what is true. They look for contradictions between two plausible principals, and with that information, figure out the differences between the two. This method allows metaphysicians to narrow down the possibilities of what is actually true.
- “Literary criticism”, is a term used to describe those who analyze literary works based upon previous works. They reference older works in all genres in order to place newer works in a similar context. This concept of “literary criticism” relates to peoples own understanding of new ideas because people often take new information and immediately compare said information with past experiences, thus giving the information personal meaning. Ironists use such criticism to influence their own beliefs by learning new information, interpreting that information, and comparing it to their own.
- A liberal society functions in the sense that it gives people the opportunity and freedom to view information that is new to them. Analyzing and understanding this new information gives people personal understanding by allowing them to reflect on what they have learned. This freedom to analyze and reflect is what makes a person an individual. The function of said liberal society is to ensure that people have the right to seek outside ideals, even if it is contradictory to what the society stands for politically and/or ideologically.
- Ironist practice as an ideology is an incorrect stance to take when applying it to a society of peoples. If a society is filled with ironists who dictate what they believe in based on others opinion, then the population would always be wary about their understanding of the world. Those who constantly change their interpretation of vocabulary and meanings based on their own curiosities will remain doubtful anytime they hear something new, rather than actively trying to seek truth.
- The difference between the ironist and the metaphysician in terms of their approach to others is one of personal opinion. The ironist seeks to educate those whom they deem to be incorrect. In the processes, they tend to humiliate or degrade other individuals whom have different “final vocabulary” than themselves. The metaphysician seeks to educate those in the truth for morality sake. The more individuals who seek absolute truth in a society can only better a society. The ironist seeks their own personal perfection while the metaphysician seeks perfection for all.
Unfamiliar Terms:
ubiquitous: existing or being everywhere; especially at the same time. omnipresent
parochial: very limited or narrow in scope or outlook; provincial
platitude: a flat or dull or trite remark, especially uttered as if it were profound
nominalist:
(in medieval philosophy) the doctrine that general or abstract words do not stand for objectively existing entities and that universals areno more than names assigned to them.
grist: grain to be ground
antecendently: preceeding prior
ancillary: subordinate, subsidiary, assisting
gestalt: a configuration, pattern, or organized field having specific properties that cannot be derived from the summation of its component parts; aunified whole. an instance or example of such a unified whole.
polemics: the art or practice of disputation or controversy: a master of polemics. the branch of theology dealing with the history or conduct ofecclesiastical disputation and controversy.
cotingent: dependent for existence, occurrence, character, etc., on something not yet certain; conditional (often followed by on or upon ): Our plansare contingent on the weather. liable to happen or not; uncertain; possible: They had to plan for contingent expenses.
"prima
facie": Prima facie is from a Latin expression meaning at first glance,
at first look, or in the first instance. It is a legal term for the
first examination and in common law is used to denotes first evidences
that unless sufficiently rebutted would be enough to prove a proposition
or fact in law.
interlocutor; a person who takes part in a dialogue; an interrogator
idiosynchratic:pertaining to the nature of idiosyncrasy, or something peculiar to an individual: The best minds are idiosyncratic and unpredictableas they follow the course of scientific discovery.
Chapter Summary:
There are a certain set of words deemed “final vocabulary”, by Richard
Rorty. These words are used to describe personal ideals and opinions to
others and to the user themselves. There are two schools of thought when
it comes to the usage and understanding of this vocabulary. There is
the ironist, who constantly re-describes the meanings of this vocabulary
by listening to others opinions and choosing what to agree or disagree
with. They tend to re-describe said vocabulary to others in order for
the opposite party to agree with them. Then there are the
metaphysicians, who seek the absolute truth to this vocabulary in
relation to the world using common sense and dialectic techniques. Their
goal is to not only better themselves, but those are around them.
Although both types of intellectuals have good intentions, ironists do
not seem to be achieving anything of societal importance because their
opinions change rapidly based on empirical observation. This rapid
change in opinion leaves no solid understanding for those trying to
interpret the world. The metaphysician attempts to delegate different
opinions without personal bias until they achieve the actual truth. This
practice is better suited for society it seems, because if all people
eventually understand the pure truth of the “final vocabulary”
mentioned, then we can all adjust our perspectives accordingly and live
lives of true understanding.