Notes for 11/27

1984: Book 2 Part VIII
- 6 page essay due 12/7/12 (check blackboard/the blog for more details)
- Bold inferences:
    what constitutes a bold inference as opposed to a mild inference?
    Bold -> supported by multiple sets of data
    Mild -> supported by single set of data; “obvious”: inference relates directly to mode of analysis
Example of bold inference:
1984 expresses Orwell’s anti-government sentiments using:
- the ministries
    the functions/operations
    the names
- professions
- character voices
    Winston Smith himself expresses discontent of the government
- Brotherhood*
- self-accusing
- free market

*Brotherhood:
not supposed to know each other
follow orders to the letter, even if it results in death
members: O’Brien, so far just party members; no Proles
using tactics that the Party uses
appears to be a perpetuation of the principles that the Brotherhood seeks to overthrow

A different inference:
Perhaps Orwell isn’t discontent with government in general, but he is simply anti-Communist, or anti-corruption; other monkeys in the wrench.

Use of language
    “The Proles are the future.”
vs
    “If there is any hope for the future/revolution, it’s in the proles.”
One way of writing is more poetic, more expressive.
The first sentence shows a more definitive meaning - assumes there is a future.  The second sentence is more romanticized.  Both show a different take on the future.

We then went over the prompts which consisted of 2 slideshows that offered images that our classmates thought represented 1984.  Both represented the strict control that the government had over the development had over people, mentally and physically (in a confined space).
The last prompt discussed historical parallels between the events and things that Orwell depicts in his novel, and actual historical events that happened.

No comments:

Post a Comment